reactions to the rejection of the logic Lodo Alfano were unbearable. I can understand Berlusconi, the direct question, which gives the Communists at all, although it uses the term "left" to disqualify judges, press, TV programs and Head of State.
E ' crazy, paranoid, ill, we hope that sooner or later you realize also his constituents. (too late?).
But all the other mats that talk about political judgment unified networks just do not like them. I turns my stomach.
Whenever there is a ruling against the prime minister succeeded pandemonium, like the other day sentence for civil Lodo Mondadori.
"Judges of the left." "Justice to watch" the most popular phrases.
The second sentence is an obvious nonsense because justice has its time, unfortunately long. And then at that time of year you may make a decision and when not? We draw a calendar in which politics takes a sentence? We For example, from November to January and July-August? The meaning is not clear.
I am curious, does the meaning of the first sentence.
All men have a political idea that may be right, left or center.
's inevitable.
But this can not take off work if objectivity in the task of the courts is to enforce the law, not write them, but the legislature.
can not be the political orientation of a trial court to change a law. Especially if it is to see if it is compatible with the Constitution. It seems clear, logical, and yet there are people who do not believe it.
Perhaps because it is they who would act in a different way.
Then here comes into play the professionalism, morality, or not to have your back straight.
on these issues can be discussed. These are elements that affect the objectivity of the judge.
it was no coincidence that Berlusconi, through Previti, to bribe the judge Metta.
And he was right or left?
does not matter: it was a criminal, because corrupt. No judge
honest, it left or right, the court based on their political sympathy. Hence the critical
right should have been "The Council is dishonest," or "the judges are corrupt."
But this can not be said without proof, then it was invented the prosecution policy, making people believe that politics can bend the idea seriously profesional and the obligation of obedience to the law of the court.
final note: Napolitano, who signed on a day the Alfano (like all other laws) is to me unable to play the central role.
0 comments:
Post a Comment